From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 8 23:02:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1644D16A400 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 23:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013AD43D5A for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 23:02:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so630104nzf for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jvEoH7mCz8q0oI1pUNJ2xeBPus47OfnK/hMW8B5womo8WwKnRk/JeID3xdkU3TO5gYKu52fbKyJSYYW9aPnVfa0PaKno4YBUh4ASYoYkPx4gZSgRSSm82Vf4FS3Mz4MBNLOQkF2im0NMEGFklBEbMMumKKTUlpQka1XVKnYhUZ8= Received: by 10.36.250.7 with SMTP id x7mr3655099nzh; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.57.15 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0604081602u314fd213lf628319174d383e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 19:02:45 -0400 From: "Rong-En Fan" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: RELENG_6_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:02:49 -0000 Hi, According to the webpage [1], 6.1 has been branched on April 5. However, I noticed that there is a tag called RELENG_6_1, not a branch called RELENG_6_1. For example, sys/conf/newvers.sh [2], rev 1.69.2.11, is on RELENG_6 branch with tag RELENG_6_1_BP and RELENG_6_1. It is a bit strange for me. At least, we have RELENG_X_Y branch before and RELENG_X_Y_BP tag. Is there any special reason that we have a tag instead of a branch for 6.1? Regards, Rong-En Fan [1] http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/schedule.html [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh