From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 29 16:27:31 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645C7FB1353 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.hawks123@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC15A769F0 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.hawks123@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j10so5084311qke.9 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 09:27:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ir9HkURs8+s86r3ILjcAxOClFIYRVxBpRySqoW1yxRo=; b=r19vqjFM3wAGxU/r6++7cjWkJUvb+rhw6MqIpAJtUBsECvKh4cgF9DF0/80ZYjrkJT 6L9m588RrKvm0xLQ70/tWEXmLoucMhpk3DmIMNqEJ9Coq0CqbQVW2507TCkrJW1ozClO lgah9bo1iq25+uN9ZM7FFJeuWx+dNN4yiGEgQTQ4OcBoE9X/UCks9p+cdapNQzekzirN msdgKlBA3LnMYX960FSm43KtoUY6DYbFoIF0RneZKS9/umTeWQ2KE7IvTalI6VVOR7yp nLYbJm4gtotyPWSSNtL0n2bOVVwG3eLmBaVnOtCN88BfJf/zLiH/8u98O9ip1I+dtRVL U8+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Ir9HkURs8+s86r3ILjcAxOClFIYRVxBpRySqoW1yxRo=; b=p/Bu5pazMmj0aBCjqtxYJsy10jsFAnJniQaRZc1zQl3Q8ypokRinf6kFYcpiO/3nFA HojU3yYeCmz9eLBxZ/Bn91OSDyaGw8aOnLQiSiyem3VUTI2JTRZwy/J9DHxeDYuSyPTF 2H6PiZFgja8KijY+9shAo6LkXalcs2YUo1a/WL1jBHoz78Vj9UrGmOiJmbgcjtOQv3kR 4oM9gWcumlLwr0n8pMtb53Nn+y4JDhMFg7I6LlXUapycXHvzNnbpKjtiRjid++h2J/+U W7IB69R71LxEOOgrzICc8Mol6tETxl7whz4xa651tH0Y4ngzvlDr9J+MveaLae0znfDy u4CA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBEWbWbrWItjTziZYZANyTFVg3g3QbCDRfP9izDjBsDhRjTOW9d 9XAMKETl+yiTw+pznNgmBkM9+RFNIgGmJd5/u30= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpaAgv73NYMpRV8BkLNf8IKTWSG3G6D7WYH9zch1pdAnH8W+3f2aDfWKN82ZpBnm4upcrgYzZ/fnp+7DlimRd4= X-Received: by 10.55.19.149 with SMTP id 21mr7845291qkt.253.1525019250487; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 09:27:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5AE216DC.7010905@grosbein.net> <5AE33513.1000001@grosbein.net> <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net> <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net> <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net> <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net> <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net> <5AE4D082.2070107@grosbein.net> From: Abdullah Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:27:20 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:27:31 -0000 > Sorry but getting a little confused here. > Lets say i have 2 interfaces igb0, igb1 and i want them to have tagged traffic. > I create vlan1 tagged 10 on igb0 > and vlan2 tagged 10 on igb1 > Next i create bridge0, assign vlan1 and vlan2 (no IPs on either the bridge, physical interface on VLANs)? PCs connected with igb0 and igb1 have similar IP config (e.g 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2) > Am i correct? >Yes. Sorry for duplicate post. Will test it out tomorrow, thanks. Regards Abdullah On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 21:25 Abdullah wrote: > Yes. > > Regards > Abdullah > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 00:50 Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> 28.04.2018 20:16, Abdullah Tariq wrote: >> >> > Sorry but getting a little confused here. >> > Lets say i have 2 interfaces igb0, igb1 and i want them to have tagged >> traffic. >> > I create vlan1 tagged 10 on igb0 >> > and vlan2 tagged 10 on igb1 >> > Next i create bridge0, assign vlan1 and vlan2 (no IPs on either the >> bridge, physical interface on VLANs)? PCs connected with igb0 and igb1 >> have similar IP config (e.g 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2) >> > Am i correct? >> >> Yes. >> >>