Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:12:55 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Brad D <social@brandongrows.me> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Porting question related to modifying original source code Message-ID: <CALH631=irqT4y_tYZ-Wx1RE28=b7S9=-Bda%2BiQGCNNuAcmVftA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <G3MGKPX6uvf9iwx3iaUZk50CdjmrS0fCCkf5kCueGEvPnj9e5998JEmfNdkZsdGR37Cn5fZzFfiG6AjZ_Cu9Hw_j4H3cgfjkkPSjnidzR7s=@brandongrows.me> References: <G3MGKPX6uvf9iwx3iaUZk50CdjmrS0fCCkf5kCueGEvPnj9e5998JEmfNdkZsdGR37Cn5fZzFfiG6AjZ_Cu9Hw_j4H3cgfjkkPSjnidzR7s=@brandongrows.me>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 5:09=E2=80=AFPM Brad D <social@brandongrows.me> wro= te: > > Is it uncalled for replacing problematic embedded libraries with equivale= nt ones in a port as a dependency if the library is in the repo and well ma= intained? It is the other way around, we're usually striving to use system-provided dependencies as much as possible.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631=irqT4y_tYZ-Wx1RE28=b7S9=-Bda%2BiQGCNNuAcmVftA>