From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  5 19:58:45 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1C516A401;
	Mon,  5 Mar 2007 19:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF6113C428;
	Mon,  5 Mar 2007 19:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l25JwiEx005532
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:58:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id l25JwdXR056142; 
	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:58:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17900.30319.384789.754149@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:58:39 -0500 (EST)
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070305182755.S31701@fledge.watson.org>
References: <45E8276D.60105@freebsd.org>
	<17900.24574.751134.397740@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20070305182755.S31701@fledge.watson.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org,
	Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org>, kmacy@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: New optimized soreceive_stream() for TCP sockets, proof of
 concept
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:58:45 -0000


One last note..  It looks like SCHED_4BSD does a decent job (on my
setup) w/o CPU binding, but SCHED_ULE requires CPU binding to get good
performance.  W/o CPU binding, the best bandwidth I see using
SCHED_ULE is around 5.3Gb/s with one CPU mostly idle..  With CPU
binding, it is roughly 9Gb/s.  

Drew