Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 19:17:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971012191648.736B-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971012200713.14368A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Oct 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 1997, Alex wrote:
>
> > What changing it to
> >
> > #ifdef VERBOSE_PROBES
> > printf("fnord0: disabled, not probed.\n");
> > #else
> > if (bootverbose)
> > printf("fnord0: disabled, not probed.\n");
> > #endif
> >
> > so that you could get either behavior, depending on your taste?
>
> So people who don't compile their own kernels (ie. the people
> affected by jkh's change) get to choose? :)
Or with #ifndef one could make it go the other way. I'd prefer the first
myself, as if something's disabled, I don't want to know about it, as I
probably disabled it in the first place.
- alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971012191648.736B-100000>