From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 9 15:44:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0863B16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:44:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ip193-230.digitalrealm.net [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9775E43D46 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:44:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@tvog.net) Received: from pcp01940037pcs.waldlk01.mi.comcast.net ([68.32.91.204] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1D8oTy-000KPb-Qg; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:51:22 -0500 Message-ID: <422E3A25.6030500@tvog.net> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:49:57 -0500 From: "Frank J. Laszlo" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Richards References: <20050221193206.GA48995@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tvog.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Items exist in ports, but not as packages. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:44:20 -0000 Paul Richards wrote: >Well I hit a few compile errors which I had to tweak the source code >to fix. My ports tree is the stock one which comes on the 5.3-RELEASE >cds and so perhaps it's a little old. > >There's no harm in having to tweak source every now and again. :) It >builds character. > > > If you have a fix for the port than you should submit a patch like a good user :) Regards, Frank Laszlo