Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Aug 1999 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: confusion about nfsm_srvmtofh bad behavior?
Message-ID:  <199908021513.IAA13285@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <Pine.BSF.3.96.990802072500.20420l-100000@cygnus.rush.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
:
:> 		} \
:> 		if (fhlen != 0) { \
:> 			nfsm_dissect(tl, u_int32_t *, NFSX_V3FH); \
:> 			bcopy((caddr_t)tl, (caddr_t)(f), NFSX_V3FH); \
:> 			if ((nfsd->nd_flag & ND_NFSV3) == 0) \
:> 				nfsm_adv(NFSX_V2FH - NFSX_V3FH); \
:> 		} \
:> 	}
:
:...
:
:> it then rewinds the mbuf pointers (i think) because of the
:>   over "dissection" above.
:> ---
:> 
:> why does it do the copy, then rewind it, it seems like it knows
:> it's doing something wrong and instead of fixing it, it just 
:> compensates after the fact.
:
:yes, replying to my own message.
:
:the only thing i can think of is that the extra data is safely
:ignored because the routines that use these macros seem to
:pass the version of NFS to all the function that they call...
:
:however unless i'm wrong (which i probably am) nfsV2 stuff
:could be made faster if it was correctly noted and less data
:was copied.  It would also DTRT and not access data it isn't
:supposed to :)
:
:it seems like all of the V3 handles are the same length so
:there isn't much to do there...
:
:-Alfred
    
    Well, I must say that it certainly looks like a bug.  It is not going
    to blow anything up since the nfsm_dissect() will break out if it runs
    out of buffer space, but it certainly seems inefficient.  I am somewhat 
    loath to fix anything in NFS that does not create a demonstrateable
    problem for fear of creating new problems, though, it is quite possible
    that the server code depends on the extra junk in the file handle for
    V2 mounts - A full audit of nfs_nqlease.c and nfs_serv.c would be
    necessary before this could be fixed.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908021513.IAA13285>