From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 15:17:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8011637B401; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA24400D; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:17:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leimy2k@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h5SMGt4U006906; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac.com (adsl-33-225-56.jan.bellsouth.net [67.33.225.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h5SMGqNl009171; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:16:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20030628201814.GA33532@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <890E3745-A9A3-11D7-B882-0003937E39E0@mac.com> <20030628201814.GA33532@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v578) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <37617CC2-A9B6-11D7-8E06-0003937E39E0@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Leimbach Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:16:50 -0500 To: David Schultz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.578) cc: David Xu cc: Julian Elischer cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new KSE signal code X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:17:12 -0000 On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 3:18PM, David Schultz wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, David Leimbach wrote: >> Because we aren't working on anything and need something to do... so >> we >> find >> ways to think about how we can enforce quality without understanding >> how stuff >> works first maybe? > > Umm...no, but thanks for the insult. How about: Because we are > working at 3 AM to figure out why signals aren't getting delivered > to java properly and we see an email saying that things will be > more broken ``for a while'' and misinterpret what ``for a while'' > means in this context. See previous post. > Well I apologize... it seemed we had yet another person ready to jump on someone for bothering to commit an important piece of code. My email was caught in a state where it was neither sent nor delivered but I replied to your original mail hours ago... I even think I cancelled the one that offended you but apparently not early enough. I apologize again for the insult... I just thought you were being somewhat harsh on someone who may have had a minor english language barrier. Dave