Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:30:34 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: ceo@l-i-e.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: READ_DMA48 error interpretation Message-ID: <45CA7D3A.6040302@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <33987.216.230.84.67.1170885541.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070206185626.796A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <33987.216.230.84.67.1170885541.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Lynch wrote: > [I've tried to snip away a lot of stuff, without losing any context...] [ ...trimming away context good, people can go back and read the thread... ] > I can touch the exposed front and back top (above IDE cable) and lay > my finger along it. It's "hot" but not like, "ouch hot" :-) You're not seeing any reallocated sectors and you're not seeing UDMA errors (ie, in the cabling). For lack of any better guesses, I'd gather that your drives are running above normal temps and aren't reading data perfectly, but are doing well enough that the built-in ECC is managing to deal with the issues. > I don't think it's 100C+ hot, as that's boiling -- but perhaps the > thermometer is somewhere inside or... On a good day, the thermometers actually provide a real, calibrated, accurate result...but many drives don't even come close. >> The output of smartctl -a for one or two of your drives would likely >> be much more indicative. I don't claim to be an expert in this at all, >> but some of us might spot any obvious anomalies. > > I sure appreciate the time y'all are taking on this! > > I am definitely not a hardware guy, as you have probably already > surmised. :-) You should actually run "smartctl -t long /dev/ad0" and repeat for all of the devices, and then re-check the "smartctl -a" output. Might be better not to run the self-tests all at once, come to think of it. -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45CA7D3A.6040302>