From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jun 12 13:44:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A1837B403 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:44:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA93356; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:44:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:44:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200106122044.QAA93356@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Jamie Norwood Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW almost works now. In-Reply-To: <20010612162749.A73655@mushhaven.net> References: <657B20E93E93D4118F9700D0B73CE3EA0166D97D@goofy.epylon.lan> <20010612152856.A72299@mushhaven.net> <3B267827.5090002@lmc.ericsson.se> <20010612162749.A73655@mushhaven.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > No, it has a host of limitations all it's own, not the least of which is > that is is actually less efficient at transfering files, Balderdash! HTTP and TCP both send files over identical TCP connections, which makes them equally efficient. There really is no reason for FTP to continue to exist (but yet it does). -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message