From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 9 20:13:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA02873 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 20:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA02867 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 20:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wm9ab-00060z-00; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 20:08:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 20:08:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Ollivier Robert cc: "FreeBSD's ports list" Subject: Re: Netscape/Linux 4.01b6 In-Reply-To: <19970709225451.33236@keltia.freenix.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Tom Samplonius: > > That alone would almost be enough to convince me to leave my default > > work env of a 12in bw monitor with several virtual consoles. > > From comments in comp.mail.imap, it seems that NS has some big problems > (bad behaviour, use of a special Trash folder against rules and so on...). The Win95 Netscape works fine with the Cyrus imap server. The UW server is one that Netscape has problems with. > I wouldn't use it for IMAP, fetchmail seems much better in that respect... Ugh.. why use IMAP then? The whole point of IMAP is that you can read the mail on the server, so you can access it from multiple points, without having carry your mailbox around on a floppy disk. > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: There are no limits -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #20: Fri Jun 13 00:16:13 CEST 1997 > > Tom