Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:47:21 +0800 From: Jing-Tang Keith Jang <keith@bsdvm.jtjang.idv.tw> To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: open-motif default? Message-ID: <20001106194721.A41150@bsdvm.jtjang.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011061045340.13198-100000@gate.cpmet.ufpel.tche.br>; from casantos@cpmet.ufpel.tche.br on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:53:10AM %2B0000 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011061045340.13198-100000@gate.cpmet.ufpel.tche.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the message, because I can't read PW's previous mail. :-) I'll change it to xlib, since it'll be easier to debug, for XIM projects like xcin in Taiwan. On 11/06/00, Carlos A M dos Santos wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, the fast fingers of Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami > wrote: > > > In addition, chinese/xemacs has the following: > > > > === > > .if defined(REAL_MOTIF) > > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-menubars=lucid --with-xim=motif > > .else > > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-menubars=lucid --with-xim=xlib > > .endif > > === > > XIM support in LessTif was a little bit rusty some time ago. I don't > know what is the current state, but using Motif you will not need such > test. -- Keep it simple and stupid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001106194721.A41150>