From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Jun 26 00:30:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA24674 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:30:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from net.kitel.co.kr ([210.102.35.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA24637 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:30:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swjeong@net.kitel.co.kr) Received: (from swjeong@localhost) by net.kitel.co.kr (8.8.8H1/8.8.8) id QAA16123 for freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 16:01:59 +0900 (KST) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 16:01:59 +0900 (KST) From: swjeong Message-Id: <199806260701.QAA16123@net.kitel.co.kr> To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: [Q] Which OS ver. + SCSI adpater is most stable with CAM ? Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Q1. What OS environment is most stable for CAM ? I am planning to use CAM. 'FreeBSD-stable + CAM' or 'current-980624-SNAP + CAM-980520' or 'current-980523-SNAP + CAM-980520' or the other ? Q2. What SCSI-adapter is most stable with double ended environment and CAM ? I am planning to use double-ending as follows ? SCSC-adapter HDD HDD HDD .... HDD SCSI-adapter | | | | | | +------+----------------+------+------+---------+----------+--------+ | | Term. Term. SymBios 8951SP (based on 53C875) or ... Adaptec 2940UW or 3940UW ? --------------------------------------- Jeong Sung Won swjeong@kitel.co.kr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message