Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:25:18 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, ak03@gte.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current Message-ID: <3DC19FBE.114305CF@mindspring.com> References: <20021031144953.E69202-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Rabson wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > It almost doesn't matter which of the solutions we use as long as we do > something. What we currently have is clearly wrong but I'll list it along > with the others. Solutions so far proposed are: [ ... ] > 2. Define weak _pthread_* symbols in libc and probably weak pthread_* > symbols either in libc or somewhere else (libXThrStub?). A pthreads > implementation defines strong _pthread_* and strong pthread_*. This is the > linux solution (without the _pthread_* indirection). Actually, Alexander was suggesting: > 2. Define weak _pthread_* symbols in libc and weak pthread_* symbols > in libc. A pthreads implementation defines strong _pthread_* and > **does not define** pthread_*. This is the Solaris solution. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DC19FBE.114305CF>