From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 21 12:42:11 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA10318 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 12:42:11 -0700 Received: from etinc.com (etinc-gw.new-york.net [165.254.13.209]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA10312 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 12:42:06 -0700 Received: from trumpet.etnet.com (trumpet.etnet.com [129.45.17.35]) by etinc.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA05553; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:58:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:58:19 -0400 Message-Id: <199510211958.PAA05553@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Amancio Hasty Jr." From: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Subject: Re: ISDN: Sync vs Async. Was: Bragging rights.. Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>>> dennis said: > > > > >> If you can get an extras $50 or $100 a month the price of the card is > > >> recovered quite quickly. and since the smart sync uses less CPU at the hu > b, > > > > >Hmm... > >Now, if you can show that the telcos charge about $100 for a 128kb T1 line >then I can see your arguments for sync peripherals. I don't think that you understand this thread at all. We're talking about async ISDN vs sync ISDN, which has nothing to do with fractional T1 which you are referencing. Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25