Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:04:23 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: funny strlen defines in sys/alpha/alpha/alpha-gdbstub.c
Message-ID:  <20010703090423.V506@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20010702113423.B7023@hades.hell.gr>; from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:34:25AM %2B0300
References:  <20010702113423.B7023@hades.hell.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2001-Jul-02 11:34:25 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
>     130 #define strlen  gdb_strlen
>     131 #define strcpy  gdb_strcpy
>
>Is it really necessary to do this funny thing with the #defines?  I
>mean, why not replace the calls with gdb_XXX() ourselves and be done
>with it?

Alternatively, given the XXX comment, why not delete the local copies
of str{cpy,len}() and just usr the library versions?  The original
reason appears to be to avoid the possibility that str{cpy,len}() are
not re-entrant.  The FreeBSD ones _are_ re-entrant and it doesn't seem
likely that we will re-write them not to be re-entrant.

Peter

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010703090423.V506>