From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Sep 12 3:34:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443C837B423; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 03:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA21588; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:34:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Marius Bendiksen , Mike Smith , Poul-Henning Kamp , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device probing... References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Sep 2000 12:34:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: Matthew Jacob's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2000 16:55:21 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Jacob writes: > Good idea, except it's hard to debug unless you have a working ddb or gdb or > something (which is very rare these days for the machines I usually work on). Make the message spooler conditional on DEBUG not being defined. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message