From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 28 03:30:35 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA01147 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 03:30:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA01138 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 03:30:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id UAA06204; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 20:30:26 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36B04265.842788DA@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:56:37 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy CC: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: btokup() macro in sys/malloc.h References: <99Jan28.131753est.40347@border.alcanet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Jeremy wrote: > > I'll support that. The example given in style(9): > > a = b->c[0] + ~d == (e || f) || g && h ? i : j >> 1; > > should rate as an entry in the Obfuscated C competition rather than > an example of maintainable code. As a matter of fact, what's the reasoning behind this particular style(9) recommendation? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com If you sell your soul to the Devil and all you get is an MCSE from it, you haven't gotten market rate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message