From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 29 13:50:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from light.imasy.or.jp (light.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBD337B401 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:50:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by light.imasy.or.jp (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6/light) with UUCP id f7TKoew16380; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 05:50:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from peace.mahoroba.org (IDENT:FS9FhbItI4IQCc4qt+ot6onazNJICEZcFWqIhRQqiZdX1y91O0q5OWjSFAMga9XL@peace.mahoroba.org [3ffe:505:2:0:200:f8ff:fe05:3eae]) (authenticated as ume with CRAM-MD5) by mail.mahoroba.org (8.11.6/8.11.6/chaos) with ESMTP/inet6 id f7TKnpj02827; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 05:49:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 05:50:29 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20010830.055029.48456313.ume@mahoroba.org> To: wvhemel@vub.ac.be Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ume@mahoroba.org Subject: Re: ipv6 route configuration From: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: References: <20010830.034358.39231250.ume@mahoroba.org> X-Mailer: xcite1.38> Mew version 1.95b119 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.imasy.org/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 0C 53 FC 5D D0 37 91 05 D0 B3 EF 36 9B 6A BC X-URL: http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, >>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:55:56 +0200 (CEST) >>>>> Wouter Van Hemel said: > It is reject route to avoid loop at aggregate point. Actual segment > should use /64. wvhemel> So I can't assign a /48 straight to my internal network? I forgot to answer this. Why you want to assign such large prefix for one segment? /48 means you have 16bits /64 subnets. wvhemel> What's the logic behind that? Use of /64 for each subnet is principle. wvhemel> What about static routes from wvhemel> 3ffe:b80:1c8::1 --> router wvhemel> 3ffe:b80:1c8::2 --> server1 wvhemel> 3ffe:b80:1c8::3 --> server2 ? You can still use 3ffe:b80:1c8::1/64 ... -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message