From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sat Jun 20 11:02:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F8334E386 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49pt73061Jz3bBm for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0319434E208; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E0734E207 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49pt726GkTz3Zyj for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D245DB5CC for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05KB2c3E058209 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05KB2cRH058208 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247430] Linux ports install too much Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tijl@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:02:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247430 Tijl Coosemans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tijl@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Tijl Coosemans --- a) is because there are several 32-bit only Linux application ports. Also, when I announced that I would remove the option to install a pure 32-bit linux_base on amd64 there was immediate response from users worried that th= eir applications might break. So I do think 32-bit support is actively used. I use it myself now that I think about it. I don't object to adding a knob f= or this somewhere, perhaps via bsd.default-versions.mk since this would be a tree-wide option and not a per-port option. For end-users the ideal is probably to have separate packages though, which is a lot more work. b) is something the Linux infrastructure ports have always done. I think i= t is needed for strict compliance with the GPL, but even for non-GPL code it may= be wise to have our own copy of the source code. You never know why it might = be useful. Note that only package builders actually download the file. Regul= ar make doesn't. Also note that an SRPM may contain patches that are not in t= he corresponding FreeBSD port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=