From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 26 19:50: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from iquest3.iquest.net (iquest3.iquest.net [209.43.20.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D6F315065 for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (qmail 13138 invoked from network); 27 May 1999 02:49:52 -0000 Received: from dyson.iquest.net (198.70.144.127) by iquest3.iquest.net with SMTP; 27 May 1999 02:49:52 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA08912; Wed, 26 May 1999 21:49:47 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199905270249.VAA08912@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: Note on my experience with Netscape 4.6 In-Reply-To: from Kris Kennaway at "May 27, 99 10:29:28 am" To: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au (Kris Kennaway) Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 21:49:47 -0500 (EST) Cc: chat@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Wed, 26 May 1999, John S. Dyson wrote: > > > Gang, > > Didn't know where to post this, so just thought > > that I'd tell you that if you are running the > > Linux version of 4.6, give the FreeBSD version a > > try if you can. It really seems LOTS faster on > > startup, and might even be faster in general for > > some reason. > > How is it stability-wise? That seems to be the major reason most people use > the Linux version over the native one. > So-far about the same. There are some sites that seem to cause problems with both of 'em. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message