From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 28 18:12: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88AF14A10 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 18:12:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jedgar@fxp.org) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id C6D109B38; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:12:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDC6BA21; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:12:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:12:06 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" X-Sender: jedgar@pawn.primelocation.net To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Will Andrews , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/15135: new port: devel/cervisia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > > > And I still pose the question, is it okay to port an application > > requiring the new gcc and marking as broken for < -current until the > > qt/kde apps require the new gcc and/or mainstream release uses it. > > USE_NEWGCC= yes > But the app will not link if the kde libs are compiled with the old g++ (2.7.2.3) ----- Chris D. Faulhaber | You can ISO9001 certify the process of System/Network Administrator, | shooting yourself in the foot, so long Reality Check Information, Inc. | as the process is documented and reliably | produces the proper result. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message