From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jan 23 15:39:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21056ED9AF3 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (lab.alexdupre.com [93.151.207.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F4D826D2 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 63377 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2018 15:39:40 -0000 Received: from 151-0-207-195.ip282.fastwebnet.it (HELO ale.bitgold.com) (sysadmin@alexdupre.com@151.0.207.195) by lab.alexdupre.com with ESMTPSA; 23 Jan 2018 15:39:40 -0000 Subject: Re: svn commit: r459751 - in head/lang: . solidity solidity/files To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org References: <201801231358.w0NDwMa8074241@repo.freebsd.org> <20180123140938.GA73049@FreeBSD.org> <57ffd7bd-6a3f-b315-b582-17d9dccee5a8@FreeBSD.org> <20180123151811.GA68777@FreeBSD.org> From: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20672682-8a8d-affc-7bbe-022c076bd1d9@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:39:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180123151811.GA68777@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:39:44 -0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> Come on, then the comment for the scala port should be "Programming >> Language"? > > `lang/scala's COMMENT is also quite bad. It is not an excuse to add > more bad and excessively-cap'ed COMMENTs. It's not an excuse, I simply don't agree. The fact that the programming language has the same name of the port doesn't exclude its use in the COMMENT. You are saying that another Solidity compiler can have the comment "Yet another Solidity compiler", but the solidity port cannot have "Solidity" in its comment because it matches the port name, it doesn't make any sense. The rule has been created to avoid comments like "XYZ is another Solidity compiler", where XYZ is the port name. -- Alex Dupre