Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:18:15 +0200 From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler Message-ID: <CAMVU60as9p9GxDCJNqCEavQ4U=S5V3OnovN53oyGxRuFOZ0kiA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com> References: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of > our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't > really help us all that much. > I disagree. Just a tiny bit ;-) If the PR says that USE_GCC=4.2 works as a workaround, it helps. -- chs,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMVU60as9p9GxDCJNqCEavQ4U=S5V3OnovN53oyGxRuFOZ0kiA>