From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 23:57:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF88416A4D0; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:57:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8083C43D1D; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:57:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1MNvmeC097456; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:57:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1MNvmKt097455; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:57:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:57:47 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050222235747.GA97415@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502141722.10259.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050215014037.GA51389@dragon.nuxi.com> <200502221701.57560.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502221701.57560.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated quirk-driven R3000Z patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:57:48 -0000 On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 05:01:57PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 14 February 2005 08:40 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:22:10PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > > it to work, please let me know and include the FADT header from your > > > acpidump in your reply, thanks. ... > > Exactly which parts of 'acpidump -t FADT' are pulled for these entries? > > Given this output, I'm not sure which one would make an ACPI quirk from > > if they needed to. > Does this machine need the quirk? Nope. It is a VIA K8T800-based system and just the one I was sitting on when I was reading your email. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)