From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 27 23:18:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE6D1065695; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com) Received: from mail.clearchain.com (leo.clearchain.com [199.73.29.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CCF8FC0C; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.151] (wcl.ml.unisa.edu.au [130.220.166.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.clearchain.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9RMwUpQ003927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:28:38 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com) Message-ID: <4AE77BF8.3040907@clearchain.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:32:16 +1030 From: Benjamin Close User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (mail.clearchain.com [199.73.29.74]); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:28:41 +1030 (CST) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, benjsc@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, thompsa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can we turn off WPI_DEBUG X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:18:21 -0000 On 28/10/09 08:59, Doug Barton wrote: > I cc'ed those who seem to have put the most/recent effort into > sys/dev/wpi. > > Is there any objection to turning off WPI_DEBUG by default? it creates > a lot of spam that the average user doesn't need. I use my 3945abg > every day and haven't had any problems with it for ages so I think > it's safe to say we're out of the period were debug by default is needed? > I've no objections, I was originally turned on to aid in helping user issues. Many of these seem to have now been solved. Cheers, Benjamin