From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 13 14:54:27 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040B932C;
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:54:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4BA1FB9;
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:54:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nb981.math ([134.28.254.135])
 by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap3) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
 id 0M0iAY-1VYQUv3FuQ-00v93h; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:16 +0100
Message-ID: <52AB1E6F.7040506@janh.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:19 +0100
From: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
References: <20131112201922.GA4330@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>	<20131113173143.Horde.a-9M7JQ_vHo3tpDIMsGK6g1@webmail.df.eu>	<CAFMmRNxk25AJ3TMuceSG=EmL3qSE9Xhk_wpL5pAD8YvZrA6gkg@mail.gmail.com>	<5283CA3C.3080201@FreeBSD.org>	<352D9465-9840-43F0-A3A9-327DC12B0967@FreeBSD.org>	<B2F7EDA4-DF34-4D5D-B995-5ADA1A9898D8@FreeBSD.org>	<20131114144555.GA22093@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>	<52963A90.4000201@janh.de>	<20131127204556.2974a3f5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>	<20131201150640.12ea18c8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>	<20131213011204.GA10879@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Cmnf5qJB88Lu+0hbW0GHPqxJ9m1fJvLpwvVhmARNUCY
 quUxYDHGky2EcubVE/iKN+kGYZ7p7w8tkC05LmmYYwK49NnJjF
 LrPQ3iiwnA+zkdNANZU6ghOsEkJWg9UrwTnSnm3skL6WJo7Y/L
 TeSUob7aAXLVKTY/zZrT0wwZE/qnCVzhtEukflVNB0NIJmx4Ak
 aAVu4qcOoe9vxxkUtJ1JhAXSHFxpfuLxIjBNf/50tEsj4KbfK5
 M0ExM7cmu+rRaHN0U3+IOmTVJtTSCs10HYTRnLzk7bzUygksNt
 lToNxrc7cNUx7qU5UpjIp2WfSxOZ7W1CbpuYK/ERvlx4JeoQw= =
Cc: Maho Nakata <maho@FreeBSD.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, stephen@FreeBSD.org,
 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:54:27 -0000

On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
>> I see the octave port is still broken.
>>
>> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, 
>> reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
>> I'm see the original problem.
>>
>> % octave
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>
>> PLEASE, commit your patch ASAP.
> 
> Committed in r336344.

Thank you!

Is it exactly the same as you attached here:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-December/046986.html

Or should I rebuild on my machines?

Cheers,
Jan Henrik