From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 03:47:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F6F16A424 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 03:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimajima9@yahoo.com) Received: from web50005.mail.yahoo.com (web50005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9E7A43D45 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 03:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimajima9@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 8805 invoked by uid 60001); 25 May 2006 03:47:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=y0wrjR4V4Ce+HnblJFzHuGLyuycMHCVPDG8hnK7v/mdIyHIN+0hVkli4ByYEtOZQQGKz7hhEWog+Rzh9wuRfZlei9hRAushoLCVe1sMavOmEzoli6qzfJJZr+xBmpIckDlhmtNPXX/LV4+HmHspWu/19MvswNizFHYSXm3bQVgU= ; Message-ID: <20060525034701.8799.qmail@web50005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.174.41.131] by web50005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2006 20:47:01 PDT Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:47:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Angstadt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44751D88.7010201@aaronholmes.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Portmanager Output Resolution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 03:47:02 -0000 --- Aaron Holmes wrote: > Jim Angstadt wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I > am > > very pleased to say that my times have decreased > from > > an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run. > > > > Along the way, I have cleaned up "conflicts" and > did > > "pkg_delete" on several applications that were > > "included in base" or that really were not needed. > > > > Now I'm faced with situations where I don't have a > > clue. Below is partial output from "portmanager > -s". > > I have manipulated each line to avoid line > wrapping > > problems, I hope. > > > > 00129 have:cdrtools-2.01_4 > > /sysutils/cdrtools > > OLD available: cdrtools-2.01_5 > > 00131 have:libcdio-0.76_1 > > /sysutils/libcdio > > OLD available: libcdio-0.77 > > 00141 have:dvd+rw-tools-6.1 > > /sysutils/dvd+rw-tools > > built with OLD dependency: cdrtools-2.01_5 > > 00186 have:nautilus-cd-burner-2.14.1 > > /sysutils/nautilus-cd-burner > > built with OLD dependency: cdrtools-2.01_5 > > 00250 have:sound-juicer-2.14.3 > > /audio/sound-juicer > > OLD available: sound-juicer-2.14.3_1 > > 00255 have:gnome2-2.14.1 > > /x11/gnome2 > > built with OLD dependency: sound-juicer-2.14.3_1 > > > > In the case of cdrtools or libcdio or > sound-juicer, > > I think this is telling me that I have an older > > version installed and a newer version is > available. > > > > What should I do in this situation? > > > > In the case of dvd+rw-tools or nautilus-cd-burner > or > > gnome2, apparently I have a solid-gold chance to > mess > > up dependencies. > > > > What should I do here? > > > > Please note that I am new to FreeBSD and have a > very > > limited exposure to using "make" to build > packages. > > Any links to dealing with portmanager output > > would be appreciated. > > > > Jim [...] > Is it absolutely necessary for you to update these > dependencies? > If it is, you can try portupgrade but that my > very well break > everything :p So far, the few apps that I have used appear to work as expected, but I have not tested many that I hope to use. I was under the impression that it is desirable and reasonable to resolve portmanager output. Is this a mistaken idea? Thanks, Jim __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com