From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 08:34:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC594704 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067B3150C for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA21247; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:34:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1WXRTq-000LiS-Et; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:34:06 +0300 Message-ID: <5343B446.9090309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:33:10 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Firefox noticeably less stable on 10.0 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 08:34:13 -0000 on 07/04/2014 17:42 Christian Weisgerber said the following: > Back in January I wrote: > >> Since I upgraded from 9-STABLE to 10-STABLE, about two weeks ago, >> Firefox (www/firefox) has become substantially less stable. It >> used to crash so rarely that I don't really know how often (monthly? >> less?). Now it seems to randomly crash every 1..2 days. No >> discernible pattern and the session restore picks up without problems >> where it left off. > > For the record, this appears to have resolved itself over the last > month or so. I have no idea what changes (in base, in dependencies, > etc.) might be responsible, but Firefox--now at 28.0--has become > stable again on 10.0-STABLE. > My guess is it was r261867. -- Andriy Gapon