From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 6 21:01:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA13367 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 21:01:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA13355 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 21:01:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@cain.gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA19668; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 13:31:18 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199807070401.NAA19668@cain.gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: "Michael R. Gile" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd 3.0 stability In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Jul 1998 22:25:15 -0400." <4.0.1.19980706222225.01022100@mail.wsg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 13:31:18 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > is anyone on this list running both 3.0-current and 2.2-stable, that could pe > rhaps give me a comparison? i am interested primarily in the SMP capabilitie > s, to use with other freebsd machines, rather than running Linux, but would l > ike some opinions on the stability of 3.0, given the fact that 3.0-release pr > obably wont be seen for some time. Well, I can say 'it works for me'.. I don't use SMP tho. I also don't use softupdates either :) Still my machine is quite stable. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message