From owner-freebsd-net Tue Apr 9 9:48:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f41.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B69837B405 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:48:24 -0700 Received: from 135.180.144.113 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 09 Apr 2002 16:48:24 GMT X-Originating-IP: [135.180.144.113] From: "ipver four" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: TCP Timestamp option? Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 12:48:24 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2002 16:48:24.0243 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D36D030:01C1DFE6] Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org My packet traces show that FreeBSD 4.5 TCP connections conatin TCP timestamp option in the TCP header. So, the TCP/IP header size is 52 bytes (instead of 40) most of the time. Is there a reason for including the timestamp option on most of the TCP packets? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message