From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 26 14:31:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D87D37B428 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 388FEAE162; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:31:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:31:03 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Andrew Cc: Terry Lambert , Dan Nelson , Volker Stolz , Ian , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: idprio Message-ID: <20020326223103.GC93885@elvis.mu.org> References: <3CA0D3FE.8113515C@mindspring.com> <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Andrew [020326 14:27] wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Sure it can, if the idprio process has locked a vnode trying to update > > But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a > process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor? While sleeping for IO. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message