From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 19 11:20: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110E837B400 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:20:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2JJK5U87140; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:20:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:20:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203191920.g2JJK5U87140@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/36104: Patch for some XFree86-4 ports. Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36104; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Hidekazu Kuroki Cc: will@csociety.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/36104: Patch for some XFree86-4 ports. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:15:54 -0500 On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:09:44AM +0900, Hidekazu Kuroki wrote: > > > 4.2.0-libGLU-bad-extern.patch > > This doesn't apply to us, we don't use "newer versions" of GCC. > OK. > But if anyone use gcc30, gcc31 or gcc32 for building XFree86-4, > doesn't a problem occur? No, because they will use the system CC for it. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message