From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 20:07:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E5116A420 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFB0C43D55 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 11870 invoked by uid 0); 28 Mar 2006 17:06:09 -0300 Received: from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(201.17.152.115):. Processed in 0.535176 secs); 28 Mar 2006 20:06:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.69.69.69?) (201.17.152.115) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 28 Mar 2006 17:06:08 -0300 Message-ID: <4429972C.5030806@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:06:04 -0300 From: Patrick Tracanelli Organization: FreeBSD Brasil LTDA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051013 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <17444.13967.998120.314837@bhuda.mired.org> <200603281139.29588.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200603272210.43032.soralx@cydem.org> <44296F41.1050209@osoft.us> <4429959B.4070209@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4429959B.4070209@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cloning a FreeBSD HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:07:22 -0000 >> I heard its faster if you use two dd's; i.e: >> >> # dd if=/dev/ad0 bs=64k | dd of=/dev/ad1 bs=64k >> >> allowing read and write to proceed in parallel. > > > that's what ddd and 'team' are for. > I don't know if ddd is in the ports as it may clash inname with teh > debugger ddd > They internally fork and use several processes synchronised in some manner. Isn't dump+restore and a couple of fdisk+bsdlabel trick to copy the source partitioning a better choice to "clone" this HDD? -- Patrick Tracanelli (31) 3281-9633 / 3281-3547 316601@sip.freebsdbrasil.com.br