From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 17 05:47:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA11889 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 05:47:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from jkh.cdrom.com (root@ppp-78.toiyabe.com [207.92.38.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA11884 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 05:47:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@jkh.cdrom.com) Received: from jkh.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by jkh.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA08270; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 05:46:55 -0800 (PST) To: Alfred Perlstein cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of patch? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:32:32 EST." Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 05:46:53 -0800 Message-ID: <8266.879774413@jkh.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > i'm about to do a 'make world' and remake my kernel too, i was wondering > if and what has been done to the kernel to fix the 'f00f' bug? > > i don't want to rebuild everything if there has been no fix for the 'f00f' > bug. Even if there were a fix for the F00F bug in the tree, which there isn't yet, it would have absolutely nothing to do with your make world. This change, when it's made, will be in the kernel and entirely separate from the world build. > what kind of performance impact are we talking about with the fix? Hopefully negligible enough to be unmeasurable. Jordan