Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:27:09 -0800
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        ak03@gte.com
Cc:        Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current
Message-ID:  <3DC1A02D.5068C5C2@mindspring.com>
References:  <20021030234026.M22480-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> <3DC07094.F67F5C66@mindspring.com> <20021030180238.A7388@FreeBSD.org> <20021031083910.GA21482@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021031054542.A51595@FreeBSD.org> <20021031101026.00a06d97.kabaev@bellatlantic.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> Wrong. Solaris and Linux differ from FreeBSD each in its own way.
> 
> Linux    provides strong pthread definitions in libpthread
> Solaris  provides weak pthread and _pthread definitions in Libc
>          with libpthread providing strong _pthread and weak pthread
> 
> We are the weird one it seems.

Exactly.  My only question is the necessity of the weak pthread
in libpthread (our libc_r).  It seems to not be needed, but is
harmless (IMO).

-- Terry



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DC1A02D.5068C5C2>