From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 24 13:29:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA07106564A for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from mail.digiware.nl (mail.ip6.digiware.nl [IPv6:2001:4cb8:1:106::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E618FC08 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9338153434; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from mail.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bU_m8DgC8k1t; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.67] (opteron [192.168.10.67]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31377153433; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FBE37CD.9040907@digiware.nl> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:49 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Kandaurov References: <4FBDE81C.9010909@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00:56 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Daily, weekly, security scripts.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:29:54 -0000 On 2012-05-24 14:01, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 24 May 2012 11:49, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> [I looked for a better list to drop this on, but other that freebsd-rc >> nothing seems close.] >> >> Hi, >> >> I nagged about the verbosity of the periodic scripts. >> But did not give any example. [example stripped] >> This would call for something like $periodic_quiet?? >> and then generating the headers only if there was something to report. > Hi, > you could try to start with: > > security_show_success="NO" > daily_show_success="NO" I looked in some of the security scripts and that variable is not used in the ones I looked into. But perhaps in script/tools that does the overall calling of the /etc/periodic/security/* scripts. --WjW