Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:37:24 -0500 (CDT)
From:      David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com>
To:        Tom Embt <tom@embt.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: upgrading/CVSUPping with bad ISP connection
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96.991028163404.24605A-100000@shell-3.enteract.com>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19991028171255.0108f960@mail.embt.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Tom Embt wrote:

> 
> I should've known this was coming ;)  I had to do this recently on my
> -current box following the massive signal changes, however I've not yet
> adopted this as standard policy.  I guess I've got the old "kernel and
> userland should be in sync" idea embedded too far into my head.  Well, that
> and i don't recall ever having a bad kernel that wasn't My Own Stupid Fault.

Build a kernel that won't boot, install a world that won't work with it, and
you are SOL.  Build a kernel that won't boot, and leave the old world
installed, and you just boot kernel.old.
> 
> Is the "kernel before world" philosophy going to become SOP?

It looks like it; there are some issues, like needing EGCS to compile a
current kernel, which you wouldn't have, coming from 3.x.  Regardless, it is
still I good idea.

DAvid scheidt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96.991028163404.24605A-100000>