Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:24:49 GMT From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@secnap.net> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/149637: security/clamav 0.96.2 nconsistent assumptions about CPU architecture Message-ID: <201008140224.o7E2Onb1004880@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201008140230.o7E2U4Z6026315@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 149637 >Category: misc >Synopsis: security/clamav 0.96.2 nconsistent assumptions about CPU architecture >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Aug 14 02:30:04 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Michael Scheidell >Release: 7.1 amd >Organization: SECNAP Network Security >Environment: uname -a FreeBSD bct.ionspam.net 7.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p3 #0: Mon Jun 29 18:03:33 GMT 2009 admin@ionspam.spammertrap.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ENTSPAM amd64 >Description: when I start 0.96.2, I get: LibClamAV Warning: libclamav and llvm make inconsistent assumptions about CPU architecture: 0 and 2.Please report to http://bugs.clamav.net I filed a bug with clamav (might be clamav problem, you might want to track it) see https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2205 >How-To-Repeat: install clamav 0.96.2 and restart. >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201008140224.o7E2Onb1004880>