Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:54:29 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, Bernhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@bluelife.at>, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, Big Lebowski <spankthespam@gmail.com>, ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays? Message-ID: <20140126185429.GB30300@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <52E46C6C.6060001@mu.org> References: <CAGBxaXnXwo4JxnRdffZfdvfETfhgJNkFM-N23H1SOT0G3-oMwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-m3X2dQTTsbrTJg2iPT3qkfq7h9U8oGbRZXGAXH%2BJ2T4MFNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHcXP%2BdtHPHT%2BFD8RdcqhGANBPf1Gk4N4coEpZY-eAuQE3iZtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-m3X2rWk-0k_yH1PK0iN_5YhvSh1UsV0VCrroJq==687X1ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <52E43A80.4030501@rawbw.com> <CAGBxaXnfb2yPZZCaf6mYzASzT13b68A8iPT6eUwUdU9W1ya_Qg@mail.gmail.com> <52E44BC1.7040404@rawbw.com> <CAGBxaXkCWAAfA%2B7x9-icTwO4Vd78EGOeh5-4eG3DUJ_gGVHT1g@mail.gmail.com> <52E45137.5070703@rawbw.com> <52E46C6C.6060001@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:01:16PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 1/25/14 4:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > On 01/25/2014 15:48, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > >> Git hup (or*ANY* remote service for that matter) is a no go IMO > > > > But both Debian and Fedora do this with automated remote testing, and= =20 > > they don't seem to complain. > > How is our ports different in this respect? > > > I don't get this either. >=20 Because what they do is more complicated than that and they have way more p= eople dedicated to review, btw Fedora cannot be compared given they have way less packages than we have but even if you do compare, then you will discover th= at the automated tasks are about the same has what we have. Concerning debian, the human review is also the bottleneck as for us, they = have just way more people working on packages. So more people to review things. regards, Bapt --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlLlWeUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ey/AQCggryCF0HLEYzp7SmyTw3AHEyT 9KcAmQFGydb3L9OyV+mPeFOt0+vVlqlR =gdWi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140126185429.GB30300>