From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 2 14:54:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CEB1065675 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D2F8FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o32EmFrn033165; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:48:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:48:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20100402.084823.152000421379278429.imp@bsdimp.com> To: uqs@spoerlein.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20100402091758.GP85798@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20100401.132414.151475392393136085.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100402091758.GP85798@acme.spoerlein.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing support for NOFOO X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:54:32 -0000 In message: <20100402091758.GP85798@acme.spoerlein.net> Ulrich Sp=F6rlein writes: : On Thu, 01.04.2010 at 13:24:14 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > I'm planning on removing the support for the NOFOO variant of : > building. This has been obsolete since before the branch that crea= ted : > stable/5. As this file will be empty afterwards, I plan on removin= g : > it in a bit. : > = : > Comments? : = : Yes, several ports' Makefiles still use the old spelling of, eg. NOMA= N. : Not sure if that will break installation, and head is the right place= to : find out. : = : Perhaps an exp run can be scheduled, or is that too big a cannon? If the resources are available, I'll schedule a run. So that means it won't be for a few days yet, since the big port upgrade date is Sunday, I think. Warner