Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Feb 2006 04:55:06 -0300
From:      JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
To:        Sten Spans <sten@blinkenlights.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: AMD 64 stability
Message-ID:  <200602240455.07500.joao@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0602232343410.13647@tea.blinkenlights.nl>
References:  <43FCEF9C.5050308@bluelight.org.uk> <43FE094A.8030302@datafarm.de> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0602232343410.13647@tea.blinkenlights.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 23 February 2006 19:45, Sten Spans wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, V. T. Mueller wrote:
> >
> > Besides, you should take a look on the compatibilty list again, counting
> > the number of server boards with chipsets that can address up to 32 GB =
of
> > RAM ;)
>
> Opterons don't use chipsets to access main memory ...
> The motherbord just needs enough slots and good
> enough traces to support a fully populated memory bus.

nonono
how much memory a processor can access is one thing  but how much is suppor=
ted=20
on the system depends on the motherboard capability so you can not put 96GB=
=20
on the board if it supports only 32

Jo=E3o







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602240455.07500.joao>