From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 16 12:55:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA621158B8 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from mail.scc.nl (i224.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.25]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA01389; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:54:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA14942; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:54:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <37B86C81.10308359@scc.nl> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:54:41 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Andrzej Bialecki , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables References: <199908161709.KAA10454@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Well, it's also a module, so perhaps we should create the whole subtree > :for modules (as was already discussed several times..) > > Yes, this is very true. But I think we are fooling ourselves if we > believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future. > Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-) I don't think we'll do ourselves a favor if we allow the Linuxulator to be compiled into the kernel again. To much depends on it to be a module. I write down "modules.linux" as an option (and a good one too, IMHO). -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message