From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 30 16:42:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05D5837B401 for ; Thu, 30 May 2002 16:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 53486 invoked from network); 30 May 2002 23:42:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pipeline.ch) ([62.48.0.54]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 May 2002 23:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3CF6B895.FC525A19@pipeline.ch> Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:41:09 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann Reply-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Blankensteiner Cc: Terry Lambert , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD daemon configurations redesign References: <00c601c2082d$bc531ff0$6800a8c0@rafter> <3CF6B300.145E0CD9@mindspring.com> <011201c20832$34404750$6800a8c0@rafter> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel, Terry, whoever, Please move this discussion from -arch to -chat. F'upt set. Thanks -- Andre Daniel Blankensteiner wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Terry Lambert" > > Daniel Blankensteiner wrote: > > > I don't know anything about the SysV-style, but yes the core/base > > > daemons and the user/port daemons should be kept apart! > > > > If they weren't, then all daemons might as well be ports, > > have package registrations, and be easily replaceable and/or > > removable for small footprint installations. > > > > And without our bimonthly "why is sendmail there by default?" > > flame-fest, where would we be? > > Well maybe create a daemons system. Something like ports but only with > daemons, then all daemons work the same way (regarding where they place > the files and what they are called and "what" is in them). Then no > daemons it there by default, but when they are installed they all act > and look like base daemons? > Or something like that......maybe the daemon "ports" should not have 3 > ftp server to choose from, but then services like sendmail it not there > by default. > > Terry, what do you think about the /etc/daemons/ suggestion? and the > other things about logging, user access file and so on? > > br > db > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message