Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64523: Make samba-libsmbclient subport of samba-devel Message-ID: <200404071600.i37G0gCH003054@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/64523; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/64523: Make samba-libsmbclient subport of samba-devel
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:49:20 +0200
--Boundary-02=_DMCdA3AprakmlzN
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 17:22, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> >1.) samba-devel and samba-libsmbclient still conflict
> >with each other, which
> >doesn't make sense. Having a client library installed
> >must not prevent people
> >from installing the server.
>
> This is quite compleax question, on my opinion. The
> problem with current approach is that samba-libsmbclient
> installs the most simplistic version of library, bare
> bones, I'd say.
This can probably be optionalized in the samba-libsmbclient port.
> My point to keep libsmbclient in samba-devel is the one,
> mentioned above, plus expences of double compilation of
> samba tree, which isn't so small. If everyone(who depend
> on libsmbclient) thinks it's ok, we can get rid of client
> library from samba-devel.
We really have to at some point. For example with the current status quo, y=
ou=20
cannot install samba-devel when you're using KDE - because kdebase depends =
on=20
samba-libsmbclient (as it only uses client functionality) and with that=20
installed, the CONFLICTS prevents users from installing samba-devel.
> >2.) The slave port has stylebugs (see ports/64393).
>
> Hm.. I've looked over the whole PR and didn't find
> anything, in the slave port, that conflicts with the
> statements there. Contrary, samba-devel itself has
> problems with style and doesn't validate by portlint(but
> thats a separate issue, that involves OPTIONS and
> structure of bsd.ports.mk).
>
> Can you point me, what's wrong with the slave port on your
> opinion.
I can't - I guess I imagined the errors I saw, forget about it :-}.
=2D-=20
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
--Boundary-02=_DMCdA3AprakmlzN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBAdCMDXhc68WspdLARApzWAJ9cUhOs/SHxlRRVwMdTeDIEdAEh0QCfeeBO
RbvJ2Z1TKA2qXu+9Lu0XarI=
=jRRt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Boundary-02=_DMCdA3AprakmlzN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404071600.i37G0gCH003054>