From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 15 10:54:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3558B16A4CE; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8E38043D1D; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:54:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (5o64qjcj@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14])
	by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1FIs4o26222406;
	Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:54:04 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:54:04 +0300 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Melvyn Sopacua <freebsd-current@webteckies.org>
In-Reply-To: <200402151944.33290.freebsd-current@webteckies.org>
Message-ID: <20040215215230.N13958@news1.macomnet.ru>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040215130356.56481G-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	<200402151944.33290.freebsd-current@webteckies.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Jails that keep hanging around
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:54:06 -0000

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, 19:44+0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:

> On Sunday 15 February 2004 19:39, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your summary.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Should I worry about these jails or is it harmless:
> > >
> > > It's probably harmless unless there's a leak.  Jails are fairly
> > > light-weight objects, so if it takes a little longer to GC due to TCP,
> > > it's OK.  On the other hand, if there's a leak, that's very bad;
> > > likewise,
> >
> > It is a leak.  I proveded a how to repeat sequence in my previous
> > reply to this thread.
>
> Actually - your example suggests a connection hanging around, but in my case,
> `netstat -an' doesn't show any connection on the ip. More to follow (poking

Sure, they are GC after TIME_WAIT expires.

> around sys/kern/kern_jail.c to try and get the value p->pr_ref).

-- 
Maxim Konovalov