Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:07:19 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> Cc: frank@opengroupware.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, durian@shadetreesoftware.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/linux-opengroupware Makefile Message-ID: <20060629120719.GA2076@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <20060629123042.5vvc68edk4s0ccok@netchild.homeip.net> References: <200606281034.k5SAYjhS084686@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060629091205.GA1300@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20060629123042.5vvc68edk4s0ccok@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:12:06 +030=
0):
[...]
> >Hmmz, you set the EXPIRATION_DATE in the past (2006-06-15).
> >Are you sure this is what you intended?
>=20
[...]
>=20
> Aside from this, I don't think this expiration date hurts. Currently =20
> the port can not be used (see the content of the PR). All we need to =20
> do is to get the native version into the ports tree.
>=20
The thing is that setting EXPIRATION_DATE in the past is the same as
removing the port immediately (because someone, for example me :-),
will pick it up and remove it because it has expired).
--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFEo8J2Fw6SP/bBpCARAtBrAJ9F84USQ+6rcSVpb0ey8mpEXeR5mgCfTKbv
VpGXiSFeqc/vbSbcei5N0b4=
=Ju09
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060629120719.GA2076>