From owner-freebsd-security Sun Apr 23 21: 4: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC9A37BAAC for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 21:04:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (05-065.dial.008.popsite.net [209.69.13.65]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA77288; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 21:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE4381939; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:03:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:03:45 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Mike Silbersack Cc: Wes Peters , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stream.c followup / MFC request Message-ID: <20000424000345.C85896@argon.blackdawn.com> References: <38FFB270.C4C8DD9F@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from silby@silby.com on Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 10:17:39PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 10:17:39PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > Hm, looks like nobody on this list is running 3.x anymore. I do, but I don't get attacked often enough to care. :-P > FWIW, I haven't had any problems since I started using a kernel with the > patch applied, I think it's safe to go ahead. I didn't make any sort of technical review, but if it works on 4-STABLE, then it should be MFC'd. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message