From nobody Tue Nov 1 20:01:46 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N21BP5m2Pz4h8gK for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iio7@tutanota.com) Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.tutanota.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N21BN5prvz4MWy for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iio7@tutanota.com) Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B24FBF9C9 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:01:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1667332906; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=gYjkn7KQVS5ygrG6/bRL8DExG9OZr3ZbKw/17/SU5oY=; b=jXHY87n9OqhCAiSw+n1w08cHRcAJJK2J1Zxazt5AVqDH+mwImCE2hWiDD/wcNlfB MQkRJHdGXPvto2J3hWrgZxtXzwCtFAVL4XxmDGknkI7p/mFo6D88N+a5zoqFNNfSWAP PRqzhFmmYEXrmZSBglrqXJP4ctMpKvFkD0hNgfUWj+YGvfj+AvAGUhVPSGJmGPfv+ce ZvcVa2JgW8LQJULbvpbWVjejLl+GiocOpQep3FN45weTWi8gmSZA1L6nujUrmWP9tIi Dw+qZmpR/vPRKQeOAinQTJhjY/mzKvtjo8tSK67+tQkWaUaqC/Rk1BR8M3hsLYblLGi mcC65rlBuQ== Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 21:01:46 +0100 (CET) From: iio7@tutanota.com To: Freebsd Questions Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the status of the FreeBSD development processes? List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N21BN5prvz4MWy X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tutanota.com header.s=s1 header.b=jXHY87n9; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=tutanota.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of iio7@tutanota.com designates 81.3.6.162 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=iio7@tutanota.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.04 / 15.00]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.965]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.92)[0.922]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tutanota.com,quarantine]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:81.3.6.160/28]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tutanota.com:s=s1]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24679, ipnet:81.3.0.0/18, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tutanota.com:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Am I to interpret the overwhelming amount of responses as business as usual? > Since the release of the "Statement on FreeBSD development > process"[1], what has practically changed? > > In OpenBSD, AFAIK, absolutely no code goes into the project without at > least 2 people reviewing it and approving it. > > Has FreeBSD improved in that regard, and if so, how? > > Thanks. > > Kind regards. > > [1]: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2021-March/057127.html >