From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 20:26:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDB016A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:26:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.imp.ch (mx1.imp.ch [157.161.9.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFB143D4C for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:26:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from mx3.imp.ch (mx3.imp.ch [157.161.9.18]) by mx1.imp.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9JKQDoL043448 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:26:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from mx3.imp.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.imp.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i9JKQCKv025067 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:26:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: (from clamav@localhost) by mx3.imp.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9JKQBgu025063 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:26:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from cvs.imp.ch (cvs.imp.ch [157.161.4.9]) by ns1.imp.ch (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id i9JKQ8ox060770; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:26:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:26:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20041019155056.GB54984@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20041019222401.P70496@cvs.imp.ch> References: <20041019105211.G5193@cvs.imp.ch> <20041019161407.N70496@cvs.imp.ch> <20041019155056.GB54984@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Resent: Yes X-Spam-Checksum: ca10d8ab70ae3df568737d223e0df0dd X-Virus-Message-Status: No X-Virus-Status: No, scantime="0.0009 seconds" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5 scantime="6.3303 seconds" tests=BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Userland proc looses cmline args. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:26:26 -0000 Hi, > BTW, let's be realistic here: a "showstopper" would be a critical bug > that prevents the operation of the system. What you're describing > would be called a "minor problem". If rc.d stop scripts do not work anymore I'd not call it a minor problem. Ok, compared with a panic() you may be right. Martin